È vero che la Chiesa primitiva proibiva in modo assoluto di risposarsi dopo il divorzio?
Parole chiave:
divorzio, seconde nozze, indissolubilità del matrimonio, Ambrosiaste, AgostinoAbstract
La possibilità di seconde nozze nella Chiesa cattolica è ancora oggi oggetto di un intenso dibattito, anche nella Chiesa di rito latino. L’indagine storico-giuridica sulla disciplina delle seconde nozze nella scrittura e nella tradizione pre-Agostiniana dimostra che l’insegnamento dell’assoluta indissolubilità del matrimonio non era uniformemente accolta, anche nella Chiesa occidentale. Il commento di Ambrosiaster all’insegnamento paolino, infatti, dimostra che la possibilità di seconde nozze non era sempre esclusa, almeno fino a quando l’insegnamento di Agostino diventò la tradizione dominante in occidente.
Parole chiave: divorzio; seconde nozze; indissolubilità del matrimonio; Ambrosiaster; Agostino.
Riferimenti bibliografici
<p>Berrouard, Marie-François. “Saint Augustin et l’indissolubilité du mariage. Évolution de sa pensée.″ <em>Recherches Augustiniennes</em> 5 (1968): 139-155.</p>
<p>Bévenot, Maurice. “Ambrosiaster’s Thoughts on Christian Priesthood.” <em>Heythrop Journal</em> 18 (1977): 152-164.</p>
<p>Bof, Riccardo, and Leyser, Conrad. “Divorce and Remarriage between Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages: Canon Law and Conflict Resolution.” <em>Making Early Medieval Societies: Conflict and Belonging in the Latin West, 300-1200</em>. Cooper, K. & Leyser, C. Eds. Cambridge (2016): 155.</p>
<p>Crouzel, Henri. <em>L’église primitive face au divorce: Du premier au cinquième siècle</em>. Paris, 1970.</p>
<p>Dodaro, Rosa. <em>Remaining in the Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church</em>. San Francisco, 2014.</p>
<p>Geerlings, Wilhelm. “Das Verständnis von Gesetz im Galaterbriefkommentar des Ambrosiaster.” <em>Die Weltlichkeit des Glaubens in der Alten Kirche: Festschrift für Ulrich Wickert zum siebsigsten Geburtstag</em>. Aland, B. et al. Eds. Berlin, 1997.</p>
<p>Grubbs, Judith Evans. <em>Women and the Law in the Roman Empire: A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Widowhood. </em>London, 2002.</p>
<p>Heggelbacher, Othmar. <em>Vom römischen zum christlichen Recht: Iuristische Elemente in den Schriften des sog. Ambrosiaster</em>. Freiburg, 1959.</p>
<p>Hunter, David G. “Augustine’s Doubts on Divorce: Reconsiderations on Remarriage.” <em>Augustinian Studies</em> 48 (2017): 161-182.</p>
<p>Hunter, David G. “The Paradise of Patriarchy: Ambrosiaster on Women as (Not) God’s Image.” <em>Journal of Theological Studies</em> 43 (1992): 447-469.</p>
<p>Hunter, David G. “The Significance of Ambrosiaster.” <em>Journal of Early Christian Studies</em> 17 (2009): 1-26.</p>
<p>Krans, Jan. “Who Coined the Name ‘Ambrosiaster’?.”<em> Paul, John, and Apocalyptic Eschatology: Studies in Honour of Martinus C. de Boer</em>. Leiden (2013): 274-281.</p>
<p>L’Huillier, Archbishop Peter. “The Indissolubility of Marriage in Orthodox Law and Practice.” <em>St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly</em>, 3 (1988): 199-221.</p>
<p>Lunn-Rockliffe, Sophie. <em>Ambrosiaster's political theology</em>. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2007.</p>
<p>Madec, Goulden. "Introduction aux «Révisions» et à la lecture des œuvres de saint Augustin." (1996).</p>
<p>Munier, Charles. “L’échec du mariage dans l’église ancienne.” <em>Revue de droit canonique</em> 38 (1988): 26-40.</p>
<p>Nautin, Pierre. “Divorce et remariage dans la tradition de l’Église latine.” <em>Recherches de science religieuse</em> 62 (1974): 157-173.</p>
<p>Reynolds, Philip Lyndon. <em>How Marriage Became One of the Sacraments</em>. Cambridge, 2016.</p>
<p>Reynolds, Philip Lyndon. <em>Marriage in the Western Church: The Christianization of Marriage during the Patristic and Early Medieval Periods</em>. Leiden, 1994.</p>
<p>Rist, John Michael. “Divorce and Remarriage in the Early Church: Some Historical and Cultural Reflections.”<em> Remaining in the Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church</em>. Ignatius Press, 2014. </p>
<p>Souter, Alexander. <em>Study of Ambrosiaster</em>. Cambridge, 1905.</p>
<p>Vilella, Josep. “The Pseudo-Iliberritan Canon Texts.” <em>Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum </em>18 (2014): 210-259.</p>
<p>Bévenot, Maurice. “Ambrosiaster’s Thoughts on Christian Priesthood.” <em>Heythrop Journal</em> 18 (1977): 152-164.</p>
<p>Bof, Riccardo, and Leyser, Conrad. “Divorce and Remarriage between Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages: Canon Law and Conflict Resolution.” <em>Making Early Medieval Societies: Conflict and Belonging in the Latin West, 300-1200</em>. Cooper, K. & Leyser, C. Eds. Cambridge (2016): 155.</p>
<p>Crouzel, Henri. <em>L’église primitive face au divorce: Du premier au cinquième siècle</em>. Paris, 1970.</p>
<p>Dodaro, Rosa. <em>Remaining in the Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church</em>. San Francisco, 2014.</p>
<p>Geerlings, Wilhelm. “Das Verständnis von Gesetz im Galaterbriefkommentar des Ambrosiaster.” <em>Die Weltlichkeit des Glaubens in der Alten Kirche: Festschrift für Ulrich Wickert zum siebsigsten Geburtstag</em>. Aland, B. et al. Eds. Berlin, 1997.</p>
<p>Grubbs, Judith Evans. <em>Women and the Law in the Roman Empire: A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Widowhood. </em>London, 2002.</p>
<p>Heggelbacher, Othmar. <em>Vom römischen zum christlichen Recht: Iuristische Elemente in den Schriften des sog. Ambrosiaster</em>. Freiburg, 1959.</p>
<p>Hunter, David G. “Augustine’s Doubts on Divorce: Reconsiderations on Remarriage.” <em>Augustinian Studies</em> 48 (2017): 161-182.</p>
<p>Hunter, David G. “The Paradise of Patriarchy: Ambrosiaster on Women as (Not) God’s Image.” <em>Journal of Theological Studies</em> 43 (1992): 447-469.</p>
<p>Hunter, David G. “The Significance of Ambrosiaster.” <em>Journal of Early Christian Studies</em> 17 (2009): 1-26.</p>
<p>Krans, Jan. “Who Coined the Name ‘Ambrosiaster’?.”<em> Paul, John, and Apocalyptic Eschatology: Studies in Honour of Martinus C. de Boer</em>. Leiden (2013): 274-281.</p>
<p>L’Huillier, Archbishop Peter. “The Indissolubility of Marriage in Orthodox Law and Practice.” <em>St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly</em>, 3 (1988): 199-221.</p>
<p>Lunn-Rockliffe, Sophie. <em>Ambrosiaster's political theology</em>. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2007.</p>
<p>Madec, Goulden. "Introduction aux «Révisions» et à la lecture des œuvres de saint Augustin." (1996).</p>
<p>Munier, Charles. “L’échec du mariage dans l’église ancienne.” <em>Revue de droit canonique</em> 38 (1988): 26-40.</p>
<p>Nautin, Pierre. “Divorce et remariage dans la tradition de l’Église latine.” <em>Recherches de science religieuse</em> 62 (1974): 157-173.</p>
<p>Reynolds, Philip Lyndon. <em>How Marriage Became One of the Sacraments</em>. Cambridge, 2016.</p>
<p>Reynolds, Philip Lyndon. <em>Marriage in the Western Church: The Christianization of Marriage during the Patristic and Early Medieval Periods</em>. Leiden, 1994.</p>
<p>Rist, John Michael. “Divorce and Remarriage in the Early Church: Some Historical and Cultural Reflections.”<em> Remaining in the Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church</em>. Ignatius Press, 2014. </p>
<p>Souter, Alexander. <em>Study of Ambrosiaster</em>. Cambridge, 1905.</p>
<p>Vilella, Josep. “The Pseudo-Iliberritan Canon Texts.” <em>Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum </em>18 (2014): 210-259.</p>
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
2018-06-06
Come citare
Hunter, D. (2018). È vero che la Chiesa primitiva proibiva in modo assoluto di risposarsi dopo il divorzio?. Vergentis. Revista De Investigación De La Cátedra Internacional Conjunta Inocencio III, 1(6), 45–64. Recuperato da https://vergentis.ucam.edu/index.php/vergentis/article/view/65
Fascicolo
Sezione
Articoli scientifici
