Procedural progress and culture in the ecclesiastical justice

Authors

  • Manuel Jesús Arroba Conde Pontifical Lateran University (Italy)

Keywords:

canonical process, judicial process, evidence system, reasoning, canonical judgement

Abstract

The legal system of the Church is born and develops in a relationship of meeting, rarely of confrontation and more often of dialogue and mutual complementarity with regard to the past and present legal systems. This work intends to highlight the dynamics of interaction between canon law and civil law in procedural matters, with particular emphasis on the way in which the law of the Church has been able to embrace institutions that already existed in the civil legal systems, but, in its case, it has also been able to regulate them in an original way in order to preserve the fidelity to the ecclesiastical mission. There are three themes addressed: the use of the procedural institution when it comes to resolving controversies arising in the community according to justice; the evidence system and the obligation of stating the reasons for the judgements.

 

Keywords: canonical process; judicial process; evidence system; reasoning; canonical judgement.

References

<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;Aspectos pastorales de la reciente reforma procesal.&rdquo; <em>Commentarium pro Religiosis et Missionariis</em> XCVII (2016): 67-103.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;Convinzione, certezza e motivazione: l&rsquo;esperienza canonica.&rdquo; <em>Criminalia</em> (2012): 163-180.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;Deontolog&iacute;a Forense can&oacute;nica.&rdquo; <em>Curso de derecho matrimonial y procesal can&oacute;nico para profesionales del foro XIX</em>. Eds. Cort&eacute;s Dieguez, M., and San Jos&eacute; Prisco, J. Salamanca (2009): 31-65.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;El proceso m&aacute;s breve ante el obispo.&rdquo; <em>Reforma de los procesos de nulidad</em>. Eds. Ruano Espina, Lourdes, and Guzm&aacute;n P&eacute;rez, Cristina. Madrid (2016): 249-278.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;El valor de las pruebas para la certeza moral de la sentencia.&rdquo; <em>SADEC, XV Jornadas anuales</em>. Buenos Aires (2018): 131-158.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;Evoluzione della &prime;interpretatio iuris&prime; nel Tardo Antico e alcune tentazioni dell&rsquo;odierna attivit&agrave; giudiziale ecclesiastica.&rdquo; <em>Koinonia</em> 41 (2017): 103-117.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;Justicia reparativa y derecho penal can&oacute;nico: aspectos procesales.&rdquo; <em>Anuario de derecho can&oacute;nico</em> 3 (2014): 31-51.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;Los tribunales diocesanos e interdiocesanos en el Motu Proprio &prime;Mitis Iudex&prime;.&rdquo; <em>La reforma del proceso matrimonial can&oacute;nico</em>. Ed. Bettetini, A. Pamplona (2017): 115-134.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;Prueba procesal.&rdquo; <em>Diccionario General de Derecho Can&oacute;nico</em>. Vol. VI. Eds. Otaduy, J., Viana, A., and Sedano, J. Pamplona (2012): 638-644.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. &ldquo;Relaci&oacute;n entre las pruebas y la comprobaci&oacute;n de la verdad en el proceso can&oacute;nico.&rdquo; <em>Anuario de Derecho can&oacute;nico</em> 1 (2012): 11-36.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. <em>Giusto processo e peculiarit&agrave; culturali del processo canonico</em>. Roma, 2016.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s. <em>Prova e difesa nel processo canonico di nullit&agrave; del matrimonio. Temi controversi</em>. Lugano, 2008.</p>
<p>Arroba Conde, Manuel Jes&uacute;s, and Riondino, Michele. <em>Introduzione al diritto canonico</em>. Milano, 2017.</p>
<p><sup>&nbsp;</sup>Belda Iniesta, Javier. &ldquo;El ministerio judicial del obispo hasta el surgimiento de la lex christiana (ss. I-IV).&rdquo; <em>Anuario de derecho can&oacute;nico</em> 4 (2015): 387-401.</p>
<p>Belda Iniesta, Javier. &ldquo;La stagione conciliare antica.&rdquo; <em>Consultare e consigliare nella Chiesa. Atti della Gionata Canonistica interdisciplinare</em>. Ed. Gherri, P. Citt&agrave; del Vaticano (2018): 71-108.</p>
<p>Belda Iniesta, Javier, and Coretti, Michela. &ldquo;Le Clementine Dispendiosam e Saepe Contigit come paradigma di sommariet&agrave;. Alcune note in chiave utroquistica.&rdquo; <em>Monitor Ecclesiasticus</em> 131.2 (2016): 361-423.</p>
<p>Belda Iniesta, Javier, and Coretti, Michela. &ldquo;Reflexiones doctrinales en torno a las Clementinas Dispendiosam y Saepe contingit: el proceso sumario a la luz del utriusque iuris.&rdquo; <em>GLOSSAE</em> (<em>European Journal of Legal History</em>) 13 (2016): 30-70.</p>
<p>Biondi, Biondo. <em>Il diritto romano cristiano</em>. Milano, 1952.</p>
<p>Cimma, Maria Rosa. <em>L&rsquo;</em><em>episcopalis audientia</em> <em>nelle costituzioni imperiali da Costantino a Giustiniano</em>. Torino, 1989.</p>
<p>Coretti, Michela. <em>La cognizione sommaria tra</em> <em>ius antiquum e ius novum</em>. <em>Evoluzione storica dell'istituto attraverso l'analisi delle fonti</em>, <em>Thesis ad Doctoratum in Utroque Iure consequendum.</em> Roma, 2018.</p>
<p>Cuena Boy, Francisco. <em>La episcopalis audientia</em>. <em>La justicia episcopal en las causas civiles entre laicos</em>. Valladolid, 1985.</p>
<p>Dama&scaron;ka, Mirjan. &ldquo;The quest for due process in the age of Inquisition.&rdquo; <em>The American Journal of Comparative Law</em> 60.4 (2012): 919-964.</p>
<p>Ferrer Beltran, Jordi. <em>Prueba y verdad en el proceso</em>. Madrid, 2002.</p>
<p>Gherri, Paolo. <em>Introduzione al diritto amministrativo canonico. Fondamenti</em>. Milano, 2015.</p>
<p>Llobell Tuset, Joaqu&iacute;n. <em>Historia de la motivaci&oacute;n de la sentencia can&oacute;nica</em>. Zaragoza, 1985.</p>
<p>Mancuso, Fulvio. <em>Exprimere causam in sententia.</em> <em>Ricerche sul principio di motivazione della sentenza nell'et&agrave; del diritto comune classico</em>. Milano, 1999.</p>
<p>Ochoa, Javier. &ldquo;La figura can&oacute;nica del procurador y abogado p&uacute;blico.&rdquo; <em>Dilexit iustitiam. Studia in honorem Aurelii card. Sabattani</em>. Eds. Grocholewski, Z., and Carcel Orti, V. Citt&agrave; del Vaticano (1984): 251-284.</p>
<p>Pe&ntilde;a Garc&iacute;a, Carmen. &ldquo;Facultades especiales del Decano y novedades procesales en la Rota Romana: &iquest;hacia una renovaci&oacute;n de las causas de nulidad matrimonial?.&rdquo; <em>Estudios eclesi&aacute;sticos</em> 88 (2013): 767-813.</p>
<p>Riondino, Michele. <em>Giustizia riparativa e mediazione nel diritto penale canonico</em>. Citt&agrave; del Vaticano, 2012.</p>
<p>Rodr&iacute;guez Chac&oacute;n, Rafael. &ldquo;El rescriptum ex audientia SS.MI de 11 de febrero de 2013.&rdquo; <em>Revista General de Derecho Can&oacute;nico y Derecho Eclesi&aacute;stico del Estado</em> 34 (2014): 1-55.</p>
<p>Taruffo, Michele. <em>La semplice verit&agrave;. Il giudice e la costruzione dei fatti</em>. Bari, 2009.</p>
<p>Vismara, Giulio. <em>Episcopalis audientia</em>. <em>L&rsquo;attivit&agrave; giurisdizionale del vescovo per la risoluzione delle controversie private tra i laici nel diritto romano e nella storia del diritto italiano fino al secolo nono</em>. Milano, 1937.</p>
<p>Vismara, Giulio. <em>La giurisdizione civile dei vescovi</em>. Milano, 1995.</p>

Downloads

Published

2018-11-15

How to Cite

Arroba Conde, M. J. (2018). Procedural progress and culture in the ecclesiastical justice. Revista De Investigación De La Cátedra Internacional Conjunta Inocencio III, 1(7), 19–44. Retrieved from https://vergentis.ucam.edu/index.php/vergentis/article/view/85

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.